>>16369
Bro, you're typing like a retard yourself.

>>16369
>Blaming the kneegrow and wetbacks can only go so far, when little zoomzoom is so fucking retarded. He literally cant write with a pen cant read a book because 70% of the page is not filled with ADs/banners/hyperlinks. Their spelling/grammar/punctuation etc etc is horrific because of autocorrect and only using a smartphone, to add to that they cant even use a fucking keyboard. They type like boomers looking at the keys and only using two fingers.
Thanks to chat-GPT zoomzooms are just as bad as the Chinese and Indians now using for all classwork. As well as figuring out ways to use it during tests&exams.


That’s funny because fifteen to twenty years ago they said the same thing about millennials when Google came out.

>I feel pity for the zoomzooms I really do they have been bred&raised to be legit mentally retarded lacking all critical thinking and logic skills completely unable to think not only outside the box but unable to complete basic tasks.


Do you have evidence beyond generational stereotypes or are you just the typical aging millennial who is butthurt about not being the culturally relevant one?

If zoomers areas bad as you say then your generation is just as bad if not more so.


Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>14719

No
By the way your question answers it's self

Wow, I thought this board would be full of actual intelligent people
Fuck this I'm back of to /b, even the rejects from niggatits are smart than this when they are pretending to be idiots

>>16906
>following a client indefinitely at the expense of your own self-care
That's what each therapist determines their comfort with. What boundaries you set is up to you. Some therapists who counsel suicidal clients give those clients their personal phone and say they can call them any time of the day or night, if their deescalation plan isn't working.
Ultimately, my aim is to be 100% attuned to a client for the 50 minutes we are together. I can take care of my needs once I'm off the clock.
>Sounds noble, I'm just wondering if it's actually how it goes and whether or not it's feasible
Much like enlightenment, deep empathy and unconditional positive regard is something to strive for. Its feasibility is always in question. How do we know if we've reached it?
>a person who has not yet given their own self proper care (because they just don't have it inside them) cannot really deeply care about someone else who is actually in much deeper shit and requires even more care, because it's just mechanically impossible
Yeah. A therapist has to get their own unfinished business in check first. That doesn't mean they have to resolve all of their issues, but they should not let that get in the way of their work with clients.
>Having went there for themselves, in their own case etc.
There are near death experiences, paranormal or spiritual experiences, and psychedelic experiences, all of which can produce a similar effect. Even with those, though, they don't lead to a perfect understanding of what a client is going through.
>And if the therapist doesn't deeply care, we'll obviously then there's no warmth and no deep empathy there anyway, even if they may pose as if they are there with them and keeping them company or holding their hand. It would be all just theatrics, even with the best of intentions in the conscious mind of the therapist.
That's why the third pillar is congruence (authenticity), next to empathy and unconditional positive regard. That's in the humanistic school anyway.
>You follow me, it's just, some of these things sound good, but our mechanically impossible.
True, I cannot be you or have a perfect understanding of you. It's mechanically impossible, so why does deep human connection feel so powerful?

>How do we know if we've reached it?
Not something that's going to be simply measured and quantified. And it's not on or off either. But I'm just saying that not every client not every therapist is going to have the ability and the depth for. And that's a problem with let's call them the big clients.

>why does deep human connection feel so powerful?
Well, if it feels that way, it probably is, but my point wasn't that that's impossible, the point was that some people go into deep shit and may not be able to find their way out, but in order to help someone like that, you need to go into equally deep shit within yourself and just like very few go there, so very few clients go there and so very few therapists go there either, I would argue even less. Someone like jung was perhaps an exception.

All I'm saying is that even if you genuinely want to be there for that client there for 55 minutes or whatever, just because you want to, doesn't mean you can, and in particular you cannot when the client is in the kind of shit that you have neither heard of nor ever imagined. And you may not be even capable of imagining it or relating to it, because where you are and where the client is is just so far far apart.

And another point I was making is that if you are comfortable in this moment, you won't go into a very uncomfortable place just because you think you care about the client. Unless you already live in that place. And have already integrated that place. I don't know, I don't want to repeat myself, but yeah, good intentions here are not necessarily enough.

>>16912
>just because you want to, doesn't mean you can
>where you are and where the client is is just so far far apart
Therein lies the question of if someone can ever truly get what you're feeling. There are, for sure, different depths of empathy and levels of connection. But I think it can take different forms, and even low levels can have power. A 5-year-old kid might not know what you're going through and decide to give you a rock he found. A cashier might smile at you and you might feel a connection, even if the only words she said to you were your total.
>And another point I was making is that if you are comfortable in this moment, you won't go into a very uncomfortable place just because you think you care about the client. Unless you already live in that place. And have already integrated that place.
>but yeah, good intentions here are not necessarily enough
How good, or should I say how responsible, are these intentions if the therapist prioritizes their own comfort over the discomfort of entering that space with the client?
Integration is important for sure. You mentioned Jung... shadow work has done a lot for me.

File 175740278757.jpg - (94.00KB , 970x539 , schizos.jpg )

>>16849
Have you seen what orthodox Jews do to infant boys? There is some serious conflicting behaviour involved in their rituals.

>god said homosexuality = bad
>sucking on baby penis = good

>>16850
Sucking on baby dicks for thousands of years will turn any community into closeted homosexuals.

>>16858
When are these kike niggers gonna learn their lesson? How many more holocausts do we need to have until they finally reign themselves in? Emperor Hadrian was fucking right all along, there's no negotiating with these sub-humans. Simply need to put them in their place or put them down like the animals that they are. Mzet b'peh my ass

>>16414
Super insane godzilla gods can only tell the truth either because they are dinosaurs.

They don't live in an alternate dimension of death, it's that the moon actually turned blood red, yes it physically changed color it's not just that you went insane and it looked like the stars fell and everything turned black because your eyes are deceived because you are the living dead.

(It's better to get beheaded than choke to death because my dick untwisted)

have you read the documents regarding project stargate? we know some sort of astral projection is possible, therefore a decent argument for a definitive soulful existence can be made and from there several arguments can be made

>>16395
what about computers?

File 175485999098.png - (1.15MB , 1280x1026 , 52585b01d8d06d313a1888dcd00f0de5_waifu2x_art_scan_.png )

>>16163
>Social media is all ages tho.
Incorrect, pretty much all social media (Facebook, Twitter, Youtube) is restricted to people aged 13+.

>>16164
>Social media isn't automatically adult.
Social media should be seen the same way as nightclubs. You wouldn't take your kids into a nightclub and then act outraged when something inappropriate for children to see happened. Adults must have spaces where they can be adults, we can't and shouldn't make the entire internet kid-friendly

>>16245
>I think much of it is a divide & conquer gayop
This is true but I believe there's no conspiracy necessary. Everything can be explained by simple human stupidity. Witch burnings weren't orchestrated by the deep state, but by ordinary hysteria and opportunistic people making shit up to get their opponents killed

>>16362
>the issue has always been that the proposal from both sides is to focus on selective circumstantial or anecdotal evidence to support or deny loli/shota.
That's pretty much it. It's an eternal debate where it's always easy to get bogged down arguing over stupid points. The debate will never be resolved unless we transcend our humanity or something
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>16703

>Social media should be seen the same way as nightclubs. You wouldn't take your kids into a nightclub and then act outraged when something inappropriate for children to see happened. Adults must have spaces where they can be adults, we can't and shouldn't make the entire internet kid-friendly



That's why we have NSFW tags.
Social media should not be viewed the same way as night clubs. And complaints about social media being "kid friendly" is usually from assholes like yourself whom already overindulged in adultaterial probably from a young age.

There are plenty of adult spaces where adults can be adults. The problem is, people have become so spoiled by that, that the mere presence of children in neutral spaces makes them pissy.

We have adults blaming kids for ruining cartoon franchises that were MADE FOR KIDS just because said cartoon franchises don't appeal to adults preferences.

>Incorrect, pretty much all social media (Facebook, Twitter, Youtube) is restricted to people aged 13+.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>16706
wow You guys really are retarded aren't you

If I see a kid online I'm going to rape them (digitally simulaculate the raping of a child)

I leave with you a visage I do know well, the seal of my home state.

>>16280
Big if true

>>16280
More like booze

>>16280
More like alcohol abuse

>>16441
Stoicism is just the pretentious male version of "empathy".

Also, glorification of suffering is shallow.
I notice that people who romanticise suffering often are ignorant of real life people going through problems

They think life is exactly like action adventure movies

>>16441
>the stoics put heavy focus on dedication, honest hard work, mastery of pleasure and pain, moderation, balance, stability, honorable conduct etc. So basically anti hedonism and anti sensationalism which attributes to stoicism not being some kind of self help bullshit but a wake up call for pulling your shit together and mental fortitude which is extremely manly because men are natural sources of strength and stability.

In theory
In reality, this is just being human in general.
Women often have to work long hours and still go home to make dinner for the kids

Also, "anti hedonism" is often used to morally harass/guilt trip men for having any form of recreation.

Hi

it's gone