>>
File
178058966946.jpg
- (391.52KB
, 2384x800
, 5525.jpg
)
>>7906
Hello,
In answer to your statement, yes, it could be light produced by the sun, interior/exterior lighting, etc. But from what I've observed, the very precise alignment of the beams, flares, and bubbles, in my view, rules that theory out.
Lens flares, for example, usually align with the point source of light and are pretty predictable.
I've even run images containing many lens flares through the computer using the same settings and sensitivities, but what appears in the final image is exactly what is in the original. (See Attached)
The beams and bubbles that appear in these images do not align with a point source of light; rather, they are perfectly aligned with the model's tits, or in the case of bubbles, are often seen drifting randomly around the model. Moreover, these structures do not appear in the visible image as flares do and only show up via deep image processing.
The admittedly amateurish study that Thomas and I have done with our own model proved that whatever is appearing on images of these women has something to do with electromagnetism, and/or the interaction of the women and the planet's magnetic field.
I had been promoted out of the department where I was able to use the instruments and computers, so my investigations had to cease. However, I've since returned to the department (in part thanks to Donald Trump!), and I'm able to use the equipment again. It's had several upgrades since I last used it, and it's now more sensitive, detecting elements such as argon, Nitrogen, and Oxygen. It's also been enhanced with A.I., so it takes care of some of the work I'm unable to do manually. I'm still not authorised to use this "officially", so my postings here will be on a when-able basis.
So, I revisited the well-known photo shoot that Eufrant did in some woods and in an abandoned building, as the outburst she had here seemed very vivid when I last processed these images. I use this particular model to study because of the many hundreds that I've looked at over the last 5 years; she is the most consistent in producing bright beams and bubbles. Also, I think many cameras at this time began to be able to capture many wavelengths of light other than the standard RGB.
Hopefully, with the following images, I can convince you that what appears in the images is not only real, but is 100% associated with the model and not an artefact caused by the camera lens or lighting.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
]
[
a /
gfx /
grim /
hi /
me /
rx /
vg /
wp /
x
]
[
aisfw /
civ /
co /
diy /
eh /
fit /
halp /
jew /
lit /
phi /
pr /
rnb /
sci /
tg /
w
]
[
ai /
cake /
cd /
d /
di /
elit /
fur /
gif /
h /
men /
pco /
s /
sh /
ss /
unf
]