/phi/ - Philosophy

- [WT] [PS] [Home] [Manage]

Posting mode: Reply

Name
Email
Subject
(reply to 15749)
Message
File
Password
(for post and file deletion)

Rules

/phi/ - Philosophy A board for pretentious debates on epistemology, ethics, aesthetics, metaphysics, and logic.

Apply them to anything: Science, sex, your mom's cooking. No topic is too sacred or profane.
Consider this your haven where being a self-righteous, over-analytical asshole is encouraged.

What isn't allowed:

1. /b/, /x/, or /rnb/. Go spew your unhinged rants elsewhere.
2. Brainless drivel. If you can’t string two coherent thoughts together, take it to ~~Twitter~~ X.
3. Claims without arguments. "Because I say so" or "because you're gay" doesn’t count as reasoning. Repeatedly trolling and bait replies without substance will be banned.

Global rules apply. No, you can’t argue your way out of a ban for being an idiot. Add to the conversation, don't detract from it.

Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
Currently 958 unique user posts. View catalog

Blotter updated: 2018-08-24 Show/Hide Show All
08/24/18 - We're still having some server issues after the move. Try again if you get a 502. Stay tuned~

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.

Anonymous 24/11/06(Wed)15:27 No. 15749

File 173090324550.jpg - (162.61KB , 600x409 , happy-birthday-nigga-dff8f961df.jpg )

Anti-natalism is fucking retarded but also has a point. Forget the troubles of this world you're gonna put a child in. Even in a perfect utopia, how can you birth a child without any way of discussing with them about their decision to be born or not and carry the burden of their senses like constant anxiety of death or hunger? Well actually, you can and people do every second according to some internet stats, but how can you justify it other than that creampies feel good?

>>

Anonymous 25/03/02(Sun)20:58 No. 16137

You give them the option by giving them birth.
By not giving them birth you take that option away from them.
If you don't want to live, nigger, you don't have to.

>>

Anonymous 25/04/19(Sat)10:36 No. 16373

File 174505180857.jpg - (130.11KB , 1600x900 , DNA-strands-concept-illustration.jpg )

>Anti-natalism is fucking retarded
Yes
>but also has a poin
No. And you are a crypto Anti-natalist

>a, how can you birth a child without any way of discussing with them about
There is no them. A child is not a real person until the age of 25. They start having real thoughts at the age of 12 and develop from there.

> any way of discussing with them
There is no them before they are born.
The child is a product, a creation I make with my upbringing and my sperm before that.

It is like you walking on me building a car and asking did I talk with the car before it was born. The statement is absolute nonsense.

> but how can you
>justify it
Because I want to.

>utopia
No one cares.

>but how can you justify it other than that creampies feel good?
What an absurd statement.

>creampies feel good?
Imagine writing this.

>creampies feel good?
How can you justify Anti-natalism except
<Dude my made up social construct of arbitrary cultural nonsense that only can develop in a civilizations end/death stage?

Because you literally have nothing.
Your ideas of consent and harm are literally nonsense that can never be justified.

>creampies feel good?
You know why sexual reproduction feel good in all males of all species?
Because they evolved this way.
>Why did they evolve this way?
Looks like you are ignorant of evolution and basic handling of reality at this point.
Can we agree on this?
>???
Either way they evolved this way because a species entire life is dependent on thriving and REPRODUCING.

If the species did not reproduce it will die out.
This is fundamental biology and evolution.

Delete post [File Only]
Password

Report post
Reason