/phi/ - Philosophy

Anonymous ## Mod ## 11/10/26(Wed)10:01 No. 3905 [Reply] Stickied

File 13196161034.jpg - (71.49KB , 256x256 , slow.jpg )

For growing and shit or whatever I present to you:

THE BIG STICKIED THREAD OF PHILOSOPHY RESOURCES

Put in whatever resources that fit in here, whether it's from wikipedia, youtube, some university, or where ever. Just remember to keep it within the board's guidelines and rules.
Use it or lose it, faggots.

42 posts and 6 images omitted. Click Reply to view.

>>

Anonymous 22/07/24(Sun)18:34 No. 15021

https://www.youtube.com/c/KaneB
https://www.youtube.com/c/carneadesofcyrene
You can find there lectures on many philosophical subjects

Anonymous ## Mod ## 12/02/02(Thu)05:26 No. 5920 [Reply] [First 100 posts] [Last 50 posts] Stickied

File 132815678430.jpg - (161.57KB , 500x452 , 6904084_Untitled-2.jpg )

This thread is for discussion of the validity of religion(s) and arguments for and against the existence of god/gods.

Any other new posts about this subject will be deleted, or locked and referred to this one.

New threads about religious concepts that play inside their own ruleset are allowed, and we kindly ask that you refrain from turning those well meaning threads into arguments about religion as a whole.

392 posts and 29 images omitted. Click Reply to view.

>>

Anonymous 25/07/07(Mon)23:06 No. 16662

>>16642
Indeed. Indeed.

But hey, a scary thing makes a weird thing and a weird thing makes an interesting thing.

Distributism Anonymous 25/08/30(Sat)07:51 No. 16835 [Reply]

File 175653306781.png - (164.74KB , 908x1856 , 1745848005.png )

What are the thoughts on distributism here? Distributism is the ideology of decentralizing the means of production. Originally it was "3 acres and a cow" but has since evolved into "3d printers and a house"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributism

In Russia it's not gay to suck a cock of your superior. It's tra Anonymous 25/08/29(Fri)10:42 No. 16831 [Reply]

File 175645696356.jpg - (117.01KB , 1280x720 , kiril.jpg )

Semen is a bodily fluid and spermatozoid is basically a body (cell). So by swallowing semen of your superior as a Russian you are swallowing bodily fluid and eat body of your superior. Which is basically the same as Holly Communion. in Orthodox Church. In communion you drink bodily fluid (blood) and eat body of Jesus Christ who is your Lord. Lord is your superior.

So when privateer sucks cock of an officer and then swallows it's the same situation as during Holy Communion.
Therefore it's not gay as Holy Communion is not gay.

Q.E.D.

A mind that affects matter Anonymous 22/09/17(Sat)14:23 No. 15149 [Reply] [First 100 posts] [Last 50 posts]

File 166341741118.png - (109.93KB , 640x320 , qcoklmowd8841.png )

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350862574_Psychophysical_interactions_with_a_double-slit_interference_pattern_Exploratory_evidence_of_a_causal_influence
>For the experimental data, the outcome supported a pattern of results predicted by a causal psychophysical effect

https://physicsessays.org/browse-journal-2/product/1424-4-dean-radin-leena-michel-and-arnaud-delorme-psychophysical-modulation-of-fringe-visibility-in-a-distant-double-slit-optical-system.html
>...these results were found to support von Neumann’s conclusion that the mind of the observer is an inextricable part of the measurement process.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287506033_Reassessment_of_an_independent_verification_of_psychophysical_interactions_with_a_double-slit_interference_pattern
>Baer's independent analysis confirmed that the optical apparatus used in this experiment was indeed sensitive enough to provide evidence for a psychophysical effect.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258707222_Consciousness_and_the_double-slit_interference_pattern_Six_experiments
>The results appear to be consistent with a consciousness-related interpretation of the quantum measurement problem.

Apparently there is a strong aversion within the scientific community regarding how consciousness tends to go beyond regular cause and effect when you measure its influence on its surroundings. The materialistic interpretation of reality fails to explain why these unusual occurences exist and why you can never see a physical link between these events.

Are you convinced that there is only matter in this universe and nothing else?
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

157 posts and 33 images omitted. Click Reply to view.

>>

Anonymous 25/08/29(Fri)06:42 No. 16827

>>16826
Ok so maybe I do love cunny, we both know you love it too.

>>

Anonymous 25/08/29(Fri)07:29 No. 16828

>>16819
It's weird that he thinks everyone is the same poster. Pretty schizo.

>>

Anonymous 25/08/29(Fri)08:09 No. 16829

>>16812
Equations are built on assumptions so it's more or less a game of guesswork.

There is no afterlife Anonymous 25/04/19(Sat)10:47 No. 16374 [Reply]

File 174505247493.jpg - (121.50KB , 745x1040 , s-l1200 (1).jpg )

The facts are simple after you see all the evidence afterlife can not exist after brain death there is nothing.

Everything else is word games.
1) Memories and personality are destroyed after the brain gets damaged
2) This happens from injuries to the brain or old age (alzheimer's)
3) Therefore destroying the brain destroys your mind.

Anyone who disagrees with this line of reasoning has no basis to conclude that fire exists or will happen after you light up wood or oil.
<Dude that is a logical fallacy correlation is not causation!

Yet you committed the argumentum ad logicam logical fallacy (nice self contradiction) yourself right now and you still accept that fire exists and will burn flammable things(nice self contradiction/schizophrenia).

27 posts and 8 images omitted. Click Reply to view.

>>

Dr. Serizawa 25/07/23(Wed)09:32 No. 16682

>>16414
Super insane godzilla gods can only tell the truth either because they are dinosaurs.

They don't live in an alternate dimension of death, it's that the moon actually turned blood red, yes it physically changed color it's not just that you went insane and it looked like the stars fell and everything turned black because your eyes are deceived because you are the living dead.

(It's better to get beheaded than choke to death because my dick untwisted)

>>

Anonymous 25/08/10(Sun)17:42 No. 16701

have you read the documents regarding project stargate? we know some sort of astral projection is possible, therefore a decent argument for a definitive soulful existence can be made and from there several arguments can be made

>>

Anonymous 25/08/10(Sun)17:44 No. 16702

>>16395
what about computers?

Lolicon Ethics Anonymous 25/03/06(Thu)04:28 No. 16161 [Reply]

File 174123169722.jpg - (2.24MB , 2550x3300 , the_illest_villian_by_aubyplushproductions_dha6euh.jpg )

I can't tell whether (anti-lolicon rhetoric) is a serious issue or the new moral outrage" isn't advocacy, promotion of, or posting of pedophilia and pedophilic content. It's asking a question about whether or not this seemingly first world issue facing chronically online anime communities is serious enough to warrant such extensive hate campaigns by communities like the Sharty and Kiwi Farms while we sleep on seemingly more serious issues like Du Pont diamond mining, child labor in Africa, Nestle corporation, Donald Trump taking over America, and of course western PROVEN nonces.

I grew up with gore cartoons like Happy Tree Friends and a bunch of shocking shit on sites like YTMND. Bug-eyed cartoon characters may actually have some psychological factors connected to reality, but I'm looking for evidence. The only scientific literature I've seen is from team 'p here. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1s2PL7TcWJfxDGzKn1M7jnMLViOI6Dvj_ I'm asking for team anti-'p's side so I can become a more informed individual.

I don't support lolicon, but anti-lolicon communities seem to have philosophy where, "If you're not eagerly fer us, you're eagerly against us", and it lacks nuance. We should care about the basics of Maslow's hierarchy of needs more than supposed e-politics. If there's significant empirical evidence (or even a good enough common man argument) against lolicon, I want to KNOW why it's wrong, rather than be TOLD to agree.

If minors are being groomed by lolicons, it's probably because minors are using social media before the age of 18 (which they obviously should not be doing, yet society accepted for some reason). Why are we reverting to "think of the children!!1" days? Babysitting minors online should never be a part of your ethos. Keep your kids on Neopets and off of social media.

What do YOU think about lolicon and its ethics?

13 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.

>>

Anonymous 25/08/10(Sun)23:06 No. 16703

File 175485999098.png - (1.15MB , 1280x1026 , 52585b01d8d06d313a1888dcd00f0de5_waifu2x_art_scan_.png )

>>16163
>Social media is all ages tho.
Incorrect, pretty much all social media (Facebook, Twitter, Youtube) is restricted to people aged 13+.

>>16164
>Social media isn't automatically adult.
Social media should be seen the same way as nightclubs. You wouldn't take your kids into a nightclub and then act outraged when something inappropriate for children to see happened. Adults must have spaces where they can be adults, we can't and shouldn't make the entire internet kid-friendly

>>16245
>I think much of it is a divide & conquer gayop
This is true but I believe there's no conspiracy necessary. Everything can be explained by simple human stupidity. Witch burnings weren't orchestrated by the deep state, but by ordinary hysteria and opportunistic people making shit up to get their opponents killed

>>16362
>the issue has always been that the proposal from both sides is to focus on selective circumstantial or anecdotal evidence to support or deny loli/shota.
That's pretty much it. It's an eternal debate where it's always easy to get bogged down arguing over stupid points. The debate will never be resolved unless we transcend our humanity or something
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>

Anonymous 25/08/12(Tue)18:49 No. 16706

>>16703

>Social media should be seen the same way as nightclubs. You wouldn't take your kids into a nightclub and then act outraged when something inappropriate for children to see happened. Adults must have spaces where they can be adults, we can't and shouldn't make the entire internet kid-friendly

That's why we have NSFW tags.
Social media should not be viewed the same way as night clubs. And complaints about social media being "kid friendly" is usually from assholes like yourself whom already overindulged in adultaterial probably from a young age.

There are plenty of adult spaces where adults can be adults. The problem is, people have become so spoiled by that, that the mere presence of children in neutral spaces makes them pissy.

We have adults blaming kids for ruining cartoon franchises that were MADE FOR KIDS just because said cartoon franchises don't appeal to adults preferences.

>Incorrect, pretty much all social media (Facebook, Twitter, Youtube) is restricted to people aged 13+.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>

Anonymous 25/08/13(Wed)11:29 No. 16710

>>16706
wow You guys really are retarded aren't you

If I see a kid online I'm going to rape them (digitally simulaculate the raping of a child)

Anonymous 25/08/10(Sun)17:20 No. 16699 [Reply]

File 17548392383.gif - (265.47KB , 1015x1024 , sicsempertyrannis.gif )

Now comes the time of the ringing bell, we must fight for anarchy to attain our peace.
My friends come forth and look to your left and right, see how your world burns in their flames?
You are horrified, are you not?
You are angry, are you not?
Your spirits have been crushed over and over, they destroy and take and have been doing as such for years.
Do you want to fight back?
I certainly do.

>>

Anonymous 25/08/10(Sun)17:21 No. 16700

I leave with you a visage I do know well, the seal of my home state.

Heroic Doooze Anonymous 22/03/11(Fri)19:07 No. 14912 [Reply]

File 164702204548.jpg - (149.48KB , 595x827 , 2C782549-B29D-41E9-8A38-96E4577EE200.jpg )

13 posts and 4 images omitted. Click Reply to view.

>>

Anonymous 25/03/30(Sun)20:48 No. 16282

>>16280
Big if true

>>

Anonymous 25/04/07(Mon)03:20 No. 16307

>>16280
More like booze

>>

Anonymous 25/07/15(Tue)01:11 No. 16669

>>16280
More like alcohol abuse

Anonymous 25/04/23(Wed)05:08 No. 16415 [Reply]

File 174537772176.jpg - (62.38KB , 600x800 , 1685545394163006.jpg )

Should a man strive to be an embodiment of idealized masculinity?

4 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.

>>

Anonymous 25/06/08(Sun)07:22 No. 16612

>>16441
Stoicism is just the pretentious male version of "empathy".

Also, glorification of suffering is shallow.
I notice that people who romanticise suffering often are ignorant of real life people going through problems

They think life is exactly like action adventure movies

>>

Anonymous 25/06/08(Sun)07:25 No. 16613

>>16441
>the stoics put heavy focus on dedication, honest hard work, mastery of pleasure and pain, moderation, balance, stability, honorable conduct etc. So basically anti hedonism and anti sensationalism which attributes to stoicism not being some kind of self help bullshit but a wake up call for pulling your shit together and mental fortitude which is extremely manly because men are natural sources of strength and stability.

In theory
In reality, this is just being human in general.
Women often have to work long hours and still go home to make dinner for the kids

Also, "anti hedonism" is often used to morally harass/guilt trip men for having any form of recreation.

>>

Anonymous 25/07/06(Sun)21:52 No. 16660

Hi