>>
I'm not left nor right, not conservative nor liberal, not trad not prog, and not Republican nor Democrat.
The Nazis reject me, so do the libertarians. My political views are a mixed bag of ideas from various political ideologies, with heavy modifications of my own made to them
My political views start out sounding libertarian, but take a turn that most libertarians wouldn't support, but that doesn't mean the natsocs or whitenats would be okay with me, either.
Start with a night watchman minarchist state (the people are not given any rights because they are by default free to do anything they want except break the laws, and the government is by default not allowed to do anything except what is strictly necessary to preserve itself from threats and to minimize the number of times when its laws are broken), the principle of nonaggression being the only laws (do not interact with the persons/bodies or property/belongings of others without having their informed voluntary and unrevoked consent to the interaction, additionally all eligible citizens must pay their taxes when they are due), and the georgian lvt (a percentage of the lands value being taken as a taxation, in exchange for the taxpayer being able to vote in elections, I'd also like to make front line service in the military or police or emergency response be a requirement for purchasing or holding land), and elections being held by a voting process I approve of (one that sees voters rank all candidates in order of preference on a ballot, being able to assign the same rank to multiple candidates, or to leave any candidate unranked, and then the count begins to find out who has the least first place rankings, and they will be removed from the running and stricken from all ballots, bumping up any candidates below them whenever their removal creates an empty space on the ballots rankings, and the process is repeated until only one candidate remains, who is crowned the winner).
But then wed ask the question who should be counted as a member of the people? To whom or to what should the NAP be applicable? And there I've decided that only those with at least one Y-chromosome in their DNA, low eumelanin levels in their skin, hair, and eyes, and are old enough to be capable of having biological children of their own should be considered human by the state/government and have the laws be applicable to them. White females in particular should be dejure outlawed and defacto enslaved, being reduced to chattel property to belong to white men (such as their fathers, brothers, sons, uncles, cousins, nephews, or other male relatives, until the ownership of them is transferred to another white man who becomes their new owners, aka their husbands). Also Democrat supporting white boys should spend their childhoods learning how to be warriors, as the most important jobs in any society have historically been the warrior caste of police and
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
]
[
a /
gfx /
grim /
hi /
me /
rx /
vg /
wp /
x
]
[
aisfw /
civ /
co /
diy /
eh /
fit /
halp /
jew /
lit /
phi /
pr /
rnb /
sci /
tg /
w
]
[
ai /
cake /
cd /
d /
di /
elit /
fur /
gif /
h /
men /
pco /
s /
sh /
ss /
unf
]