-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

Anonymous 19/06/03(Mon)12:35 No. 1464 Board: /civ/ ID: 9fe361 [Reply] [Last 50 posts]
1464

File 155955812477.jpg - (202.91KB , 1428x952 , liang-jin.jpg )

The Tianamen Square Incident is being propagandized pretty hard in western media lately. Shit's posted everywhere, even 7chan/b/: >>/b/790842. Last week this lady comes forward to give credit to the stories that the military resisted orders to storm the square; reposts of Tank Man all week everywhere else; old sources dug up and regurgitated in every mainstream outlet.

I see what you are doing; it isn't going to work.

Either someone is trying to drum up anti-Chinese sentiment, or drive a wedge between the Chinese people and their government, or convince China to apologize for oppressing its people. None of those things are going to happen. It hasn't worked for thirty years and it isn't about to start working now.

People in the west, as offended as they may be, will not stick to this longer than it stays in the headlines and two weeks from now, no one's going to care. The Chinese people only remember that it is dangerous to discuss the matter and they will never accept any version of the story other than the party line. The Communist Party of China doesn't give a fuck, and will never apologize for something that didn't happen; that's right it didn't happen, because they erased it from history.

Also, maybe it actually didn't happen: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/there-was-no-tiananmen-square-massacre/

To be honest, I think a few hundred civilians were killed as a message to future protesters, but more importantly everyone who showed the slightest empathy was removed from their posts, disappeared, and/or 'reeducated'. Military officials, television reporters, civilians outside the action zone, everyone. There is no one left alive in China to speak against the official story and there hasn't been for thirty years. Think about this: no one under the age of thirty in China has ever heard about it; they are not going to believe you no matter how you try to prove it to them. They have all been raised to think that westerners are trying to undermine the prosperity of their country, just like they did during the Opium wars.

In fact, every military and economic conflict in which western powers were involved in China--even as allies of the Chinese government--have been recast as invasions, incursions, and attacks on Chinese sovereignty. This is also how they will see the western media dragging out the Tianamen Square Incident once again. No one in China will ever see it the way our media tells us to see it.

Nothing of value will come from drumming this up again.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.


76 posts and 23 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 20/12/12(Sat)02:40 No. 1956 ID: 6311e8
1956

File 160773724448.png - (661.83KB , 1056x2880 , 1420774553816.png )

Jews were involved in the creation of modern China.


>>
Anonymous 24/12/05(Thu)08:50 No. 2502 ID: 8aca73

Wow.

Americans think that the USA was Communist in 1776.


>>
Anonymous 24/12/21(Sat)21:44 No. 2520 ID: bde2e0

>>1852
> How is it anti-Chinese to criticize an organization that has destroyed Chinese Culture and killed millions of Chinese People?

The entire concept of Americanization was to kill "indians" until they start speaking european. And that only worked once whites actually discovered actual India and Chrchill's Bengal genocide, the "indians" in USA never did.

Has "anti-American" EVER meant anything but that same kind of thing, as this "Anti-chinese"? This is exactly how linguistic logic in english EXCLUSIVELY works.




Anon Kalashnikov 25/04/18(Fri)21:15 No. 15776 Board: /w/ [Reply]
15776

File 17450037243.png - (3.25MB , 2308x1330 , yuri_likes_k.png )

was hoping to find a somewhat active /k/ community here, but this board seems pretty fucking dead.
t. 4chan /k/ refugee


11 posts and 5 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anon Kalashnikov 25/04/22(Tue)09:48 No. 15792

>>15783
America voted with Belarus, Russia and North Korea at the UN and against their European allies
America tariffed the whole world except Russia
/pol/= Fake Flag VPN /Russianpropagandaboard/
Reminder Russia has lost

>Artillery systems — 26689 (+30)

Russian losses last 24 hours and totals


22.04.2025
Tanks — 10683 (+4)
Armored fighting vehicle — 22296 (+23)
Artillery systems — 26689 (+30)
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.


>>
Anon Kalashnikov 25/04/22(Tue)09:49 No. 15793
15793

File 174530818248.jpg - (37.43KB , 292x400 , 6be40e9c5df70674b43278f74d631efb.jpg )

>>15791
chin up


>>
Anon Kalashnikov 25/04/22(Tue)09:50 No. 15794
15794

File 174530824715.gif - (2.37MB , 480x360 , 180162.gif )

>>15791
chin up>>15789




Anonymous 25/04/09(Wed)16:26 No. 89476 Board: /gif/ [Reply]
89476

File 174420880593.gif - (2.52MB , 400x380 , 1431021331_1228267237.gif )




Semilevel!33nP3QAgok 14/02/06(Thu)23:27 No. 2372 Board: /irc/ [Reply]
2372

File 139172564354.gif - (981B , 116x116 , rmq.gif )

For the nerds who didn't know yet:
There's a new page with statistics since CoreDuo's one is pretty much dead since a year or so (404).

You can find them here: http://www.reimu.nl/7stats




Yagum 13/08/26(Mon)07:10 No. 1023 Board: /banner/ [Reply]
1023

File 137749382673.jpg - (7.49KB , 300x100 , yagum.jpg )

Is this any good?


>>
Bruce Banner 13/10/06(Sun)21:37 No. 1050

YES


>>
Bruce Banner 13/12/30(Mon)00:07 No. 1083

>>1023
What is /s/ all about?


>>
Bruce Banner 14/01/22(Wed)08:48 No. 1088

This looks more like /rnb/ stuff




shota Aesop Anonymous 25/03/02(Sun)22:39 No. 114 Board: /sh/ [Reply]
114

File 174095159816.jpg - (256.67KB , 1356x2048 , 20240416_134958.jpg )


>>
Anonymous 25/03/02(Sun)22:44 No. 115


hangover/blindspot skins


>>
Anonymous 25/03/03(Mon)09:31 No. 119





Celsius ## Admin ## 09/12/28(Mon)07:43 No. 1 Board: /hi/ [Reply] Locked Stickied
1

File 12619825919.png - (268.28KB , 600x750 , 122872653197.png )

Now that this is a real board, it's time to lay down some rules:

1. Don't be a faggot

Thank you, and enjoy




join KC now Bernd 19/09/07(Sat)20:16 No. 15501 Board: /w/ [Reply]
15501

File 156788020690.jpg - (119.26KB , 670x750 , sei_dabei.jpg )

.......................................


>>
Anon Kalashnikov 19/10/11(Fri)00:18 No. 15509
15509

File 157074588943.gif - (1.13MB , 500x375 , 1570621522101.gif )

For /w/!




Minority Report Historian 19/08/23(Fri)07:47 No. 15216 Board: /hi/ [Reply]
15216

File 156653925881.jpg - (86.60KB , 750x750 , 72003525.jpg )

The key names are Lara and Sean. It's like they're begging me at this point.


>>
Analockman(ThailandNative) 19/11/05(Tue)16:03 No. 15254

>>15216
Have you considered consensual rape at this point?




Prime test Anonymous 22/02/17(Thu)19:25 No. 18131 Board: /sci/ [Reply]
18131

File 164512235712.jpg - (3.32KB , 119x122 , download.jpg )

Today one of my recurring dream characters named Jennifer Zemblini gave me a prime number test that correctly validated the first few hundred prime numbers in under 3 seconds using C# code I wrote to validate her primality test!

I wanted to share the primality test with you all now.

It uses only simple division, addition and subtraction. And three variables called n, A and B.

n is defined as the number being tested for primeness. A0 is n-2 and B0 is 2.

Then apply this procedure: Divide A by B, if it is not a clean division, meaning there is a remainder, add one to B and subtract one from A, and repeat this step until B approaches one-half of n.

If A can never divide evenly into B then n is prime.

For example with n=9, which is not prime: A = 9-2. B =2. 7/2 is not even. 6/3 does evenly divide with result 2. And 3 is a factor of 9 also.

But for a prime like 13: 11/2... 10/3... 9/4... 8/5... 7/6... None of these divide cleanly with no remainder, therefore 13 is prime.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.


4 posts and 1 image omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>
Anonymous 22/02/21(Mon)05:33 No. 18143

>>18142
>quotient is still zero when dividend = n, thus n % m == (n + m * k) % m for any integer k.
This is an error. I meant to say that the remainder is still zero.


>>
Anonymous 22/06/19(Sun)13:11 No. 18281

I want to clarify that you don't need to sweap across the entire half of the number. If there are no such A and B before B is greater than sqrt(n). There won't be any at all.
And what you did is just a fancy way to do Euclid primality test by checking the first sqrt(n) numbers if any divide n. Since you are checking if B divides A which is none but n-B
Since for all B, B divides itself
So B divides the sum of n-B and B = n
So you're back with the normal primality test, maybe even worse cause you are wasting time computing n-B.
Your Jennifer is retarded.


>>
Anonymous 23/07/26(Wed)00:04 No. 18683

Your primality test is 100% right and there is no exception to it. The only problem is that it's not only inefficient (it has an asymptotic complexity of O(n)) but it is basically testing the divisibility of n by any number in the range (2,n/2).





Delete post []
Password