>>22263
These:

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Vintage-Noma-Christmas-7-String-BUBBLE-LITES-Lights-/112182531954?hash=item1a1e999772:g:8CoAAOSwA3dYEMCE

For future reference: "Noma" bubble lights.

Btw. The series wired sets usually used the kind of bulbs that had that internal shunt thing that would add hot filament's worth of resistance and bypass the broken filament.

Oh the seller told the set uses 110 V bulbs.

>>22264
>The series wired sets usually used the kind of bulbs that had that internal shunt thing that would add hot filament's worth of resistance and bypass the broken filament.
Maybe some did, but my gut reaction is that the cheapest sets don't include any such frills, because I was the redheaded stepchild tasked with putting together working sets of Christmas lights every goddamn year when I was growing up, and those things sure as hell didn't include anything of the sort.

Lately I've been periodically involved with Christmas decorations (more correctly involved when problems arise) and these newer strings are similarly wired in series without any filament. But my workplace is known for buying the cheapest item so they may have found their sets at garage sales for all I know.

Right, now drop the bass so we can all move on with our lives

working on it right now

File Rip_Faggets.swf - (6.37MB , Rip Faggets.swf )

File 163993722761.png - (731.77KB , 900x1250 , Chris15-1.png )

page 15

File 163993726569.png - (818.15KB , 900x1250 , Chris16-1.png )

And the last page! Hope you guys liked it, if any of you even bothered reading it :P

>>15667

I want the strength and fortitude necessary to move towards something greater, I want to be able to contribute to something bigger than myself, something that will outlive me.

I toss a coin. I continue forward

>>21360

>>21508
I also wish it didn't suck dick now

File 149909140151.png - (1.39MB , 7680x4320 , 8k_think_pad.png )

+1

File 16603968566.png - (710.20KB , 680x650 , Rhodesian Light INF.png )

We will never die

i just put eveything in my inventory as protein bars so like, MY WEAPON, PROTEIN BAR. MY MASK, PROTEIN BAR.

everything about me or my body PURE PROTEIN

>>89355
how you do that?

>>18862
>Then how do humans exist?
Humans exist because they can interact with your consciousness.
And yes, this existence is a bit circular, in that something can't exist unless it is observed and nothing can be observed unless it exists, but this doesn't matter for us here.
Ultimately, any object only exists for you if it can interact with your consciousness. The end.

>I thought you were trying to argue that mathematics studies real phenomena.
Yes. By showing you that it has a physical body it uses to interact with the physical world, no different from any other physical phenomenon.

>What? Are you on shrooms?
I am perfectly lucid. If you carefully examine how your consciousness interacts with your body, you will notice a source of energy that is beyond the physical world. And once you notice it, everything becomes clear.

>Your question is like asking if burning all the English books would make people unable to communicate in English.
But of course, you'd also need to damage every English-speaking brain. And yes, English will vanish and die.
You can destroy a language by destroying everything it uses to interact with the physical world. You can destroy math the same way.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>18863
> If you carefully examine how your consciousness interacts with your body, you will notice a source of energy that is beyond the physical world.
No.

>You can destroy math [by damaging every math-doing brain].
Then you're agreeing that math is just an idea with reality independent of human minds. I ask again: What are we arguing about?

>So now you're defining math as an ability inherent to a healthy human body?
No, that's not what I said. What I said was that if you burn all the books and erase all the hard drives, people wouldn't lose the ability to do math. I don't know how you got from there to "math is defined as an ability inherent to healthy human bodies".

>They are much harder to destroy. Thus, less physical.
This is a very strange way to use "physical". They're literally half of the fundamental interactions.

>Math creates and then studies mathematical objects. Their being artificially created doesn't make them any less real.
Yes, it does. They are literally less real than physical objects, because they have fewer properties of real objects.
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>18864
>No.
Yes. Imagine a mountain. This mountain can't be found anywhere in this world. Yet it exists.
Suppose you need to describe this mountain. For this, your body would have to act in accordance with its structure. Which means the mountain, wherever it is, would have to influence your body. And such influence requires energy.
See? For you to describe the mountain, some energy would have to flow from wherever the mountain is into your body. Energy, whose properties are decided by the environment of that... Location. As easy as.

>Then you're agreeing that math is just an idea with reality independent of human minds.
Agreeing? I can't even understand what this sentence is supposed to mean.
But no. If you define math as an ability possessed by a human brain, dependent on its structure for its existence, then it isn't "just an idea."

>What I said was that if you burn all the books and erase all the hard drives, people wouldn't lose the ability to do math.
But their ability would be greatly reduced. Meaning you've damaged math by destroying a part of its body.
And if you damage the parts of their brains that were marked by math, their ability would be completely erased. Meaning you've killed math by fully destroying its body.
Even if it can be built again in the future. Similar to how a chair can be destroyed. Then built again in the future.

Message too long. Click here to view the full text.