-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]
Posting mode: Reply
  1.   (reply to 841957)
  2. (for post and file deletion)
/b/ - Random
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 10240 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 1173 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2018-08-24 Show/Hide Show All

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.


Anonymous 26/01/03(Sat)00:13 No. 841957
841957

File 176739561010.jpg - (250.01KB , 1200x814 , 20221019-alef-flying-car-02.jpg )

Hey guys, is anyone here interested in VTOL concepts?

What do you guys all think about Alef model A?

This is a video of their earlier model:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fK_WaeXprrk

I'm not the YouTube fag, I just want you to see what is already on the market and ask whether you are a fan of it, personally I'm very excited.


22 posts omitted. Last 50 shown.
>>
Anonymous 26/01/07(Wed)21:27 No. 842076
842076

File 176781765063.png - (99.03KB , 303x180 , brb.png )

jet.packs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86z-UWKJixc


>>
Anonymous 26/01/08(Thu)19:19 No. 842090

>>842076
jetpacks are hella cool and mature tech, but I'd like to talk about v-tols for civilian and military use

one challenge jetpacks and the like are facing is the following
>how do I shot gun?
because they require 2 hands to pilot, maybe integrating som sort of turret in the setup could work, or somehow managing to free one hand so it can shot gun
here's a mature enough one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YsDGHFCrVio


>>
Anonymous 26/01/08(Thu)22:14 No. 842092
842092

File 176790687292.png - (62.32KB , 176x180 , brb.png )

>>842090

ya kinda forget how fucking ridiculous bros look with their legs dangling/flopping about whilst using a jp, plus bulky, loud, limited duration: typical chanbro's sex life really, if dey have one... though there is v-toll

anywho, anti-gravity drives.


>>
Anonymous 26/01/09(Fri)00:32 No. 842093
842093

File 176791512951.png - (188.54KB , 450x472 , 1569585733954.png )

>>842092
you can tongue my anus while I fuck your non existing female sexual partner if that's what you're into


>>
Anonymous 26/01/09(Fri)01:22 No. 842094
842094

File 176791815595.png - (51.79KB , 190x251 , brb.png )

>>842093

ur mom's sex life can best be described as /community service/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-iWUu2HAWQ


>>
Anonymous 26/01/09(Fri)09:52 No. 842103

>>842094
oh I see u no hef sexual partner so u want me to fuck ur mom while u tongue my ass, ok then


>>
Anonymous 26/01/09(Fri)17:13 No. 842109
842109

File 176797519374.png - (21.52KB , 189x98 , brb.png )

>>842103
honestly, the tonged thing is kind of weird

ya suppose the design is arbitrary slash whatever fits the requirements, maybe more efficient propulsion means could be had, but for vtol the issue is how to power the device for a duration that makes it viable for any given application... arguably helicopters are vtol and a fairly mature technology. but dey don't have dat sexy car aesthetic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cqdl4Ntb_dQ


>>
Anonymous 26/01/09(Fri)18:49 No. 842110


>>842109
>but for vtol the issue is how to power the device for a duration that makes it viable for any given application
I figure fuel like kerosene (commonly used for aviation, for some reason idk lel) or gasoline, electric batteries are not there yet, but they might be relatively soon, there are models that take the battery challenge, they have very small range due to this, again this might change in the near future
>arguably helicopters are vtol and a fairly mature technology.
sure, textbook definition of vtol, right? they're fairly slow for horizontal flight though, which some vtols "solve" not without introducing further challenges, like moving rotors a),b) or non orthodox take off and landing c) (first pic related).
>but dey don't have dat sexy car aesthetic
are you the "vtols need to have wheels and also have car functionality" guy?
in my opinion, that would be a nice to have, but complicates everything further and is not all that useful given that a vtol can take off from your backyard (yes implying you're rich, we're at that stage where they are the target) and fly to your office's rooftop and land there


>>
Anonymous 26/01/16(Fri)20:58 No. 842266
842266

File 176859350145.jpg - (308.77KB , 1560x877 , 123124123141.jpg )

this topic for the weekend


>>
Anonymous 26/01/17(Sat)00:59 No. 842279

>>842266
Does this vehicle have both turbofans, helicopter rotors and wings? :-/


>>
Anonymous 26/01/17(Sat)20:47 No. 842299

>>842279
yes, vertical takeoff and forwards flight mode, like a helicopter that can fly forwards non retardedly. Obviously they need a bit more work on it, but the concept's good.
Might seem silly, but with this they can travel (in forwards flight mode) like 5x times faster if not more. While still have the benefits of vertical takeoff, which is mostly not needing a landing strip, and thus being able to land on rooftops or backyards.


>>
Anonymous 26/01/17(Sat)21:30 No. 842304

>>841962
as for this, I'm very driven medium range anti-drone shotgun


>>
Anonymous 26/01/30(Fri)22:56 No. 842539
842539

File 176981020727.jpg - (149.49KB , 1275x724 , #RÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖKT.jpg )

anyone feeling like flying car talk or nah?


>>
Anonymous 26/02/02(Mon)20:30 No. 842590

>>842539
Sure brother, what do you have in mind?


>>
Anonymous 26/02/02(Mon)22:33 No. 842591
842591

File 177006800537.jpg - (323.55KB , 1280x720 , maxresdefault[1].jpg )

>>842590
first, the fact that they discovered or re-discovered that a conventional drone, with the rotors in parallel towards the ground is magnitudes slower than forwards flying drone with rotors perpendicular towards the ground, but this introduces complexity, since you ideally want both parallel for minimal takeoff, meaning no need for landing track, and forwards for high speed.
So that, it adds complexity, because you either have both or make the rotors transition from one state to another.
Then there's this fucko (1st pic) which says fuck it I'll land like a madman to remove complexity and one isn't sure if it is genius or just madman. However that's a very original take.
Then there's the question of who will be using these, and an easy take is that it will be taken by very rich people on their trip to the office from the far away suburbs. Not extremely rich because that one will probs take an heli. Why would somebody do that? Because city roads are collapsed in the morning and evening by people going to work.
I think these two points are enough for now.


>>
Anonymous 26/02/03(Tue)16:11 No. 842611

>>842591
>1st point
Not mad. Good concept
>2nd point
Rich or not, it will never be mainstream in the civilian sector, because people are too dumb and careless to operate it. Autonomous? Yes. But like flying cars? No. It's just not the kind of society and not the kind of people that we have that would make sense to do that with. It's too dangerous unless it is for military where people can be trained and monitored and have a structured life. Flying is inherently more dangerous than driving on a road. Most people are too stupid for flying. It really takes a certain kind of mindset. Even in the military it's still dangerous. But there are people in the military more willing to accept the risks.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think even people with small airplane licenses crash all the time. This is actually quite similar. Although helicopters are more expensive so there's more filtering in terms of character who gets the licenses, but even those crash, this would be both a heli and a plane. Sorry, but I just don't see it happening, unless AI completely changes the entire global society. But at that point AI can fly you safely anyway, so who cares.


>>
Anonymous 26/02/03(Tue)16:43 No. 842612

>>842611
>point 2
it's an interesting discussion, I'm kind of fantasizing about some city for richfags kinda like the rich arabs, where they let free reign. otherwise at the very least in the first world that shit won' "fly".
I can also see grand canyon tours in those. And it's kind of safe to assume that they'll leave it all be taken care of by AI. there's an interesting take by some poster I read once. the era of secure airplanes was kickstarted by adventurous richfags of the old times, they crashed and burned like mad men, but in return we got many advancements on aeronautics security and safety development. maybe some third world places can provide reign for this to happen, but I'm not sure if richfags of the now are feeling as adventurous anymore


>>
Anonymous 26/02/03(Tue)17:27 No. 842613

>>842612
>but I'm not sure if richfags of the now are feeling as adventurous anymore
exact


>>
Anonymous 26/02/03(Tue)18:15 No. 842614

>>842613
that could easily change if 1-3 richfags take pics of them and their imported slavic prostitute in their flying motorbike and post it on ig, see? ez


>>
Anonymous 26/02/05(Thu)01:45 No. 842635
842635

File 177025230188.jpg - (434.93KB , 1945x2048 , 20260204_183245.jpg )

Anyone interested in continuing the vtol chat? It calms me.


>>
Anonymous 26/02/05(Thu)10:59 No. 842637
842637

File 177028559545.png - (1.27MB , 1297x724 , 5625323.png )

>>842635
yeah, I'm all for it


>>
Anonymous 26/02/05(Thu)11:05 No. 842638

>>842635
>>842637
wanna know a good argument against in-city v-tols? birds
somehow not an issue for helis, somewhat of an issue for commercial planes (they try to keep the landing tracks free of birds with predator birds), so I wonder how'd v-tols deal with that
another point is that decaf v-tol is fine, but as lelon mucus pointed out, we need supersonic ones
>for what
to reduce 10+h intercontinental flight times, but I guess that's a whole another category


>>
Anonymous 26/02/05(Thu)18:59 No. 842643

>>842638
Sorry bro, I come here and I see those dirty nigro thots on the front page, I immediately need a 2 hour break from this website, I'd love to chat, but that shit makes me legit nauseous. I never had to hide a thread here so I don't know how.

Fucking disgusting.

Sorry I have to vent to you, but you were the only one chatting with me. Maybe I'll check back in a bit later. Good hang and take care 🩷🙏🏻


>>
Anonymous 26/02/05(Thu)20:15 No. 842646

>>842643
> I never had to hide a thread here so I don't know how.
>front page (page 1 )
>OP post
>at the right there's a minus sign
>click it
>thread hidden


>>
Anonymous 26/02/05(Thu)21:03 No. 842648
842648

File 177032180897.jpg - (178.14KB , 928x1232 , 20260204_175817.jpg )

>>842646
Thanks bro, that worked. I'm still a bit disgusted, so give me some time, but I'll try and get back to you.


>>
Anonymous 26/02/06(Fri)17:05 No. 842665

>>842648

May you have blessed life
🥕


>>
Anonymous 26/02/06(Fri)18:54 No. 842667
842667

File 177040045694.jpg - (425.63KB , 2500x1666 , ap24354660129579[1].jpg )

move along, no discussion about flying cars allowed in the whole internet, nothing to see here

btw, don't tell me I missed the weekly perfectly legal free CP thread?


>>
Anonymous 26/02/06(Fri)20:36 No. 842683

>>842667

There are flying cars, why do few?
Well in my country we have just had over thirty-five years off illegal, some semi legal and other actual truly legal (those were very few and far between )
And well we have more twice as many cars and even more bad drivers to people who can't drive.
Oh, people call it all kinds of things , insanity, ridiculous, dangerous, criminal, scary....
You got me point, I call it entertaining, if you're sitting somewhere with a good view.
Trick is don't get close. It can be dangerous, some of these new people kind of can work a motor vehicle, they just leave the rest to god. Look both ways when crossing the street.

Right so the problem with flying cars are to many OP's back OP before the www meant Other People.
Happy now or were actually looking for a petrol head / grease monkey?

As weekly shit poster hopefully they got caught by being dumb enough to try and post that shit on wizchan, lol.
Also why does anyone post that shit here and not join the /VIP orany of the people old mothers fax machines.
I mean before Elon twitter did it all, then they switched to Masterdon where it was so obvious that what happened. That everyone knew what was going on.

I pray 🙏 that some day soon everyone will convert to carrotdom. Sow just a few seeds a month.
Ah, if you're outside and it's been raining, just bend down give Mother Earth a gentle fingering...
Even if you don't have a Carrot seed on you...


>>
Anonymous 26/02/06(Fri)21:05 No. 842690
842690

File 177040835548.gif - (2.32MB , 498x320 , 1693246854858829.gif )

>>842683


>>
Anonymous 26/02/06(Fri)21:59 No. 842694

>>842693
Chill carrots fag
It's the only shitty movie from Kubrick
Donno about the book, could be good

Go drink alcohol or whatever it is you do, this is flying car thread
I'll finger the earth when it's not frosen over into a solid block you retard


>>
Anonymous 26/02/06(Fri)22:35 No. 842695

>>842694

Okay, although I've drunk more than enough for this week already. Gosh I'm a right cunt when totally straight.
I still stand by you can't have flying cars when there are many people more retarded than.
That's just basic common sense.

Peace out, as try and take the rest of the week of being a total cunt.


>>
Anonymous 26/02/07(Sat)00:43 No. 842697

>>842695

>I still stand by you can't have flying cars when there are many people more retarded than.

*me


>>
Anonymous 26/02/07(Sat)11:21 No. 842704
842704

File 177045966331.jpg - (80.30KB , 640x566 , 1580126153780.jpg )

>>842695
>you can't have cars
yet the world is full of them
so might as well have flying car accidents too


>>
Anonymous 26/02/07(Sat)12:54 No. 842705

>>842704

>can't have flying cars

Yet you can delete one word, then green text it to prove your a shameless piss poor lazy bitchass
TROLL
I'm now wondering if you are even more ugly than the pic you posted

You are one of the reasons we can't have nice things, lot alone flying cars.

Another thing
Flying cars you mean compact helicopter that's easier to fly, easier to get a licence, easier to maintain.

Hmmmm......
I'm going to have Cartman three is a word people like this.


>>
Anonymous 26/02/07(Sat)14:41 No. 842708
842708

File 177047171168.jpg - (9.24KB , 315x338 , 1574148441580.jpg )

>>842705
I'm going to let the flying car industry know that you won't let them fly.


>>
Anonymous 26/02/07(Sat)15:11 No. 842709

>>842708

Oh that meme, how I have missed you.


>>
Anonymous 26/02/08(Sun)14:39 No. 842720
842720

File 177055798390.jpg - (16.80KB , 196x196 , 1578662689141.jpg )

>>842709
I have a vague memory of me posting that here, probably 1 or 2 years ago, I don't remember the context even


>>
Anonymous 26/02/08(Sun)15:33 No. 842721
842721

File 17705612296.jpg - (16.40KB , 300x245 , oh-you.jpg )

>>842720

Yes, you did and it's me
And were still here, doing time

Slade prison.jpg


>>
Anonymous 26/02/08(Sun)15:46 No. 842722
842722

File 177056198513.jpg - (76.53KB , 492x478 , 1751537570041531.jpg )

>>842721
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMinyvmFdOY
fuck embedding


>>
Anonymous 26/02/09(Mon)01:22 No. 842728
842728

File 177059657732.jpg - (53.52KB , 405x720 , 250b11845af940eaa10a4b197def7283.jpg )

>>842722

I think they are lying to us about parole and are just to cheap to pay for babysitter's.

If it farts again, it's sleeping on the floor.


>>
Anonymous 26/02/09(Mon)02:04 No. 842729

>>842728
what parole and babysitters are you talking about?


>>
Anonymous 26/02/09(Mon)03:23 No. 842730
842730

File 177060380469.jpg - (30.08KB , 431x300 , 736ccea3db3fc73274a20a312263efab.jpg )

>>842729

...........................


>>
Anonymous 26/02/09(Mon)11:11 No. 842734

>>842730
oh you just wanted me to pee in your lemonade? that's free of charge


>>
Anonymous 26/02/09(Mon)12:16 No. 842735

>>842734

So Flech, you know this flying car I've been designing.


>>
Anonymous 26/02/09(Mon)15:23 No. 842736

>>842735
>you know this flying car I've been designing.
yes?


>>
Anonymous 26/02/09(Mon)18:04 No. 842737
842737

File 177065667777.png - (196.24KB , 592x448 , 19578687808679509058609587985478959067548070874874.png )

>>842736

/eh


>>
Anonymous 26/02/09(Mon)18:16 No. 842738

>>842737
nah I'm good


>>
Anonymous 26/02/09(Mon)19:08 No. 842739
842739

File 177066049411.jpg - (66.28KB , 960x520 , 1770057576393126.jpg )

>>842738

ok


>>
Anonymous 26/02/09(Mon)19:23 No. 842740
842740

File 177066138590.jpg - (76.99KB , 494x440 , 1632566344427.jpg )

>>842739
I'll be kind and not bump it again, even though it is not my thread, I'm apparently the only person in the whole internet interested in talking about it


>>
Anonymous 26/02/09(Mon)22:28 No. 842742

>>842740

Hey I hope some more people turn up, and get thread back in the air.
Just in case there was in miss understanding
The pic was just me self deleting from the thread, after your post. Yeah, love Sonatine and Takeshi Kitano fan.



[Return]



Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason