>>37497
Love the smug look on the second one's face. More like this please!

(1024x1024)

(1024x1024)

(1024x1024)

>>37505
She was playfully letting him know that he is due for a haircut

>>37534
Got any more?

(1024x1024)

(1024x1024)

(1024x1024)

>>37586
I do

>>37588
Perfect. Are you making these or do you find them somewhere?

>>37591
Well you know how I said I got it from someone? That was kind of stretching the truth, because that someone isn't a human. So whether you want to say I made it or I am getting it from somewhere else is for you to decide, that's open to interpretation

>>37592
So it's AI? Could you just keep pumping them out? Or provide how you did it.

>>37593
I could keep pumping them out for forever, the thing is is that I am afraid of it becoming slop if I do that. I don't think there is some hidden trick to this, you just got to tell the A.I it's an impressionist/oil painting in the prompt

>>37594
Which AI system do you use?

>>37595
Dalle 3, it can be accessed for free on bing

>>37598
What’s your prompt?

(1024x1024)

(1024x1024)

(1024x1024)

>>37601
If I share exactly what I prompt, I am afraid people will spam the thread with low quality garbage. The stuff I posted aren't stuff I got on my first or second tries, they are stuff I had to sift through to get, sorry

Got any more?

(1024x1024)

(1024x1024)

(1024x1024)

(1024x1024)

>>37649
I do, but not a lot

File 173341711664.jpg - (146.05KB , 1024x1024 , OIG1 (2).jpg )

could you please not

>>37671
Any new ones?

(1024x1024)

(1024x1024)

(1024x1024)

>>37751
I've got a lot more new stuff, but most of it is very samey samey

>>37755
I love these. So wholesome and loving looking. Especially these, nude in bed.

>>37279

I have a bunch more of this stuff that my "mom" painted. But, AI is against the rules now.

I really like the pictures with the witches, btw. Good stuff.

>>37760
AI-generated art is against the rules on this board because there's /ai/ for all of it.

>>37761
Is there a thread for this?

(1024x1024)

(1024x1024)

(1024x1024)

(1024x1024)

>>37759
I feel the same way

>>37773
Got any more?

(1024x1024)

(1024x1024)

(1024x1024)

>>37802

>>37812
Thanks!

>>37812
Got any more?

(1408x768)

(1024x1536)

(1408x768)

>>37913

Love the crazy mom/weak passive boy energy here. Hot. Keep it up!

AI Slop. Wastes resources to create the lowest common denominator in quality at the sacrifice of water, electricity, and ethics. He shouldn't ask for fame or accolades because he literally farmed out the task to the cheapest bidder (the computer) to do something be can't do or is to lazy to do. He pays to use theft and collage software and pretends it's not just pumping out bland repeats of the same theme. There's no pride in this because that's no work done. Literally a "why should anyone care" style.

>>37959
This is so silly lol, there's nothing like this out there except maybe Pandora's Box. AI is perfect for this, mixing artstyles and content you wouldn't otherwise see

>>37928
Anything new?

(1024x1024)

(1024x1024)

(1024x1024)

>>38092

>>37141
These are very loving, romantic, and beautiful.
Tell your friend I said they are very good and I thank him. And you got posting. It's not always about nudity and fucking.

>>37959
This. What a disappointing thread. It really depresses me how excited so many absolute retards are to push this shit around everywhere. And I'm getting more and more sick of being looked at as some pearl-clutching luddite who's just scared of technology or behind the times for having such trivial, controversial opinions as "this is terrible for the environment for no real reason, it's built entirely off of illegal plagiarism, it looks like shit."

I don't know why I'm so especially mad about this being on the shota board but I am. Taboo porn genres are fun for me specifically because of the soul involved in the artists making stylistic decisions that lean into what they personally find hot about this or that fetish or fantasy. I've seen shitty pencil drawings that were genuinely hotter than anything in this thread, because they still had an energy and you knew the person who drew it was actually horny while making it. There's nothing at *all* in these pictures that elicits any kind of carnal response in me. And the fact that such nothing content was made at the daily expense of the environment and the theft of a bunch of artists who all individually probably could have made something infinitely better pisses me off to no end.


But there's always going to be faggots like >>37964 seal-clapping for this shit and begging for more. The past few years have really convinced me that this species is a complete wash and that we're never making it out of this shit.

>>38616
It's nice to see people saying positive things about about what I posted. It's weird to go back and see things from 2023, because my standards have honestly changed and I was honestly feeling embarrassed about posting the earlier ones.

An FYI, it made me sad seeing the waybackmachine delist this websites URL, I used to look at what was saved and when to figure out which one was the most liked. That is what encouraged me.

>>38619
I hear what you are saying, but at the same time, it still takes a human to ask for something, look at it, and decide if it's good enough. The stuff you write is verbatim what is posted on reddit 24/7, and while you may say so and so can draw better, you've got a whole subreddit dedicated to people regularly debating on whether an image on a pamphlet's is A.I or not. Which raises the question, if so and so can draw better, subreddits like those would be redundant because people should easily be able to tell, right? Right.

So I don't believe it's simply you or the people who think like you thinking something looks better. I believe it's simply your personal emotions getting in the way of objectively seeing the medium as it is. Similar to how a a former bill cosby fan might throw away his books or CD's and do a 180 saying they are trash. Speaking in general terms here, cause you are coming at this with a very all or nothing point of view.

>>38620
It may be a topic of debate for other knuckle-dragging retards on some reddit page but I assure you this is not just some emotional bias and that there are a number of people who *can* tell and it *does* look fucking worse. And again, any confusion between AI works and human works come from the fact that the AI is plagiarizing an unfathomable number of those human works, often very directly with little alteration.

This is what's becoming increasingly frustrating to me. I *am* objectively seeing the "medium" for what it is. I'm seeing it better than you. It's fucking nothing, there's no substance, it's a grift marketed brilliantly to tasteless businesses that want to pay humans even less money and the endless mass of unskilled retards that like the idea of being an artist but don't want to do any work.

You faggots are burying your heads in the sand and trying to deflect every REAL issue people have with these pieces--it's a plague on the environment FOR NO REASON, it's built ENTIRELY on MASS PLAGIARISM, its results ARE discernible as AI and LOOK FUCKING BAD--and trying to write it all off as "oh they're just mad or jealous or scared." No, you fucking retard!

You're personally aiding in lining some rich tech bro's pockets, accelerating the environmental and energy crisis, stealing en masse from real artists, just to mass produce images that don't even fucking look good. It seriously makes me depressed the lengths the stupid and unskilled will go to defend this shit. It makes me depressed that you've heard all of this already, you KNOW that there are REAL reasons to hate this shit already, and you just personally don't care as long as you can still type in a google search, receive some slop and get a chance to say "I made this."

>>38621
A.I can have a certain look when you leave it to its own devices. But if someone were to ask it to create something in a certain style, like for example, a crappy ms paint drawing, it will do just that. So I simply don't believe you when you say you can tell apart the organic between the artificial. How do you know the art you come across and see as organic, isn't secretly the "slop" you hate? It's like a man saying he has never came across a trans woman that he was not able to clock, how does he know that for certain? It's textbook survivorship bias except it's inverse. You don't know what you don't know, you need to be omniscient to make these kinds of assertions.

Judges in art competitions have been asking for proof to show that works were made by hand, are you saying you are smarter than those judges?

And with your whole plagiarism/environment talk(which I believe is your true grievance btw), I'd say those are more societal issues that go beyond the scope of this. Not sure what you want me to tell you? That's too bad.

>>38622
I want you to tell me you'll kill yourself you miserable faggot. I don't know if I'm envious or piteous of you for being so heartbreakingly stupid

For someone who supposedly believes in personal effort. Your personal attacks are really not super original. You went out of the way to type a few more extra words when it couldve been the standard "kys retard", so I'll give you that.