>>38082
https://exhentai.org/g/1573957/17c2677361/

Artist is also listed as Mr. Takealook

>>37887
I links don’t work for me, maybe I’m dumb.

>>38045
Speak for yourself.

I am, in some sense, a hebephile; my interest is focussed on boys, age 13 or 14. And I just want them to have realistic anatomy (and for there to be a slightly plausible scenario for why some older girl or woman is having sex with them).

And, my interest is based in wanting to BE that boy, not to be the adult doing things to/with them. Since I didn't have a ludicrously enormous horsecock when I was that age, I don't care for images or animations that depict boys with massively oversized members. It makes the self-insert fantasy much more difficult to maintain, robbing me of the ability to enjoy it.

>>38079

Are you still active? I don’t want to get too vulnerable so I won’t say it here. I went through something similar,

File 176555781925.jpg - (151.18KB , 720x1280 , IMG-20251204-WA0000.jpg )

>>36180

File 174547120987.jpg - (536.06KB , 2048x2048 , GpRnhFbW8AA2euK.jpg )

File 175129474823.png - (117.19KB , 1024x1201 , 132059158_p0.png )

>>37696
>>37854
>>37855

I like this cartoon style art!

One: using artistry as a means to make money and recognition is an overused, under-rewarded path.

Two:
>I'm only attracted to the woman and the situation itself, the shota is just a way to put myself on it. T

I hate this common sentiment with straight shota.
Why cannot people just enjoy the shots in it's entirety rather than a vicarious self-insert?
They would never do this with loli

>>37905
>They would never do this with loli

They do, constantly.
In straight lolicon the male self-insert is faceless, generic, or just a penis. Nobody cares how he looks; he’s only the viewer’s vicarious self-insert.

It’s consistent, for both lolicon and straight shota, straight males treat the male self-insert as a prop they project into and the female as the object of attraction. You kinda mixed things up thinking the younger partner is the point of attraction when that’s simply untrue, the female is.

Straight men always focus on the female partner and treat the male as a disposable camera. The avatar being younger doesn’t change that. I say this as someone who identifies as just mostly straight, I do however have a type when it comes to /ss/ even though I have very little interest in solo shota or yaoi.

I personally appreciate a well-drawn shota and I vehemently hate /ss/ art where the shota looks like shit or the artist didn’t bother to render them properly, and I even have a type, timid, curious, soft, well proportioned with specifically age appropriate dick sizes. I hate ugly bastards and bratty shotas (unless they’re in for an instant loss and severe correction).

But I understand that I'm an exception, most straight guys, rarely if ever care about the male self-insert in their porn. /ss/ is no different. I mean, look at the male comments on straight porn and you’ll see that even when it’s a gangbang with some of the fittest, most handsome guys ever, the dudes will focus and be watching the video for the single female who might even be the middest-looking bitch.(same here, idk any male pornstar except that one dude who fucked adam22s wife and Johnny sins but I can list females because I give a shit about them)

>>38104
This is why I prefer more regular shotacon

(1024x1024)

(1024x1024)

(1024x1024)

>>38092

Can you tell me the prompt you used?

>>37669
What generator did you use?

Make a picture of a boy masturbating and releasing a lot of sperm

Idk but i need more edits like that.
I think i could try to make one.

>>35698
>>37641
>>34412
It's kinda ironic that the only time heterosexual men get free "unconditional" sex is in SS, either IRL or fiction.

The normal vanilla route of sex for heterosexual men is having to depreciate yourself for the smallest inkling of approval from women.

This is why I say porn and erotic fanfiction is better than seeking sex/romance in meat space.

People love to shame those who prefer 2d over 3d for sex and romance. Yet, people who seek the 3d route always end up with veneral illness, heartbreak, unexpected offspring, alimony, etc.

>>37907

>>It's kinda ironic that the only time heterosexual men get free "unconditional" sex is in SS, either IRL or fiction.

...

Brother. Perhaps. Um. Perhaps you should consider that pretty much nothing in this world is free and unconditional, and expecting something to be is thinking that you are in some way "owed" the sex you want.

Perhaps consider that sex should be engaged in with the expectation of, at minimum, an exchange of pleasure, and more hopefully, an emotionally bonding experience as part of a larger relationship. You might find that this attitude will help you to obtain sex on a more reliable and regular basis.

>>37251
that last sentence called me out hard

Yes, AI generated.
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/110629768

>>37145

Then they aren't an artist, now are they?

They contracted it out to the lowest bidder (the computer) because they were too lazy to learn to create pictures or use actual tools. It looks like shite and wastes resources to give people slop. I'm excited to see AI is not only dying but suffering as it does so.

>>37960

I can only imagine the kind of insufferable person who calls themself an artist when all they do is ask an LLM to generate an image. Would they call themselves a chef for going to McDonald's and ordering a meal there? Because there really isnt much of a difference.