/pr/ - Programming

Code Thread butter 23/04/05(Wed)23:43 No. 5608

File 168073103377.png - (70.13KB , 694x669 , hmm.png )

Post funny/weird/cool codes, any code u saw that pick your attention and made u want to share:

def my_map(fuck, asses):
  sex = []
  for ass in asses:
    sex.append(fuck(ass))
  return sex

butter 23/04/05(Wed)23:54 No. 5609

(687x500)

(907x390)

https://github.com/MinhasKamal/CreepyCodeCollection

butter 23/04/06(Thu)00:20 No. 5610

File 168073324361.jpg - (124.97KB , 602x536 , jason.jpg )

In the RootTools app, the dev checks the license using the boolean meganFoxIsHot at com.jrummy.roottools.RootTools:

public static boolean meganFoxIsHot = false;

//...

public void finishCheck() {

  meganFoxIsHot = gnak? true : ihMsilibom;

  this.handler.sendEmptyMessage(27);

}

butter 23/04/06(Thu)00:39 No. 5611

(898x1537)

(494x639)

>>5610
now I see, there's something wrong with the [ c o d e ] here, or I am not using it correctly

Basement Dwelling Neckbeard 23/06/27(Tue)05:26 No. 5632

>>5611

ok but for real, (cond == true) is way more readable at a glance than (cond)

Basement Dwelling Neckbeard 24/04/16(Tue)02:25 No. 5684

>>5632

Depends on how you name your variables.

I find this:

if (you.areGay()) { you.suck(it) }

nicer than:

if (you.areGay() == true) ...

Basement Dwelling Neckbeard 24/06/27(Thu)22:00 No. 5706

(640x712)

(561x385)

Basement Dwelling Neckbeard 25/04/15(Tue)22:23 No. 5724

>>5684
This. Just do stuff like
bool isFake = someBullshitCondition1;
bool isGay = someUnreadableCondition2;
if(isFake && isGay)
return "OP is a faggot";

Basement Dwelling Neckbeard 25/04/20(Sun)10:57 No. 5727

>>5611
Unironically writing:
if(cond) {
return result;
}

Is retarded shit only semi-competent C programmers and JS developers do.

Most season people in programming that aren't boilerplate monkeys will even say that you should do:

for(int i = 0; i < len; i += 1) {

}
Instead of:
for(int i = 0; i < len; i++) {

}

Basement Dwelling Neckbeard 25/04/25(Fri)05:19 No. 5741

>>5727
>if (cond) is bad for... reasons
are you retarded?

>for(int i = 0; i < len; i += 1) {
>Instead of:
>for(int i = 0; i < len; i++) {
yep, you are. "readability" tard detected.

Basement Dwelling Neckbeard 25/04/25(Fri)05:20 No. 5742

>>5632
any programmer who doesn't know that
>if (cond)
is the same as
>if (cond == true)
is a retarded ape who deserves to never see gainful employment

Basement Dwelling Neckbeard 25/04/25(Fri)13:21 No. 5744

>>5741

If you think that's for readability you're more retarded than them and should have your email blacklisted from all FOSS projects.

In fact take up a new profession, I heard the world is screaming after nurses.

Basement Dwelling Neckbeard 25/04/26(Sat)00:30 No. 5745

>>5744
Sorry sweaty, the code I write is proprietary code for a fortune 5 company. No FOSS-slop for me. But go on, tell me how one way of incrementing is better than the other.

>b-b-but i++ is confusing!!!! you HAVE to do i += 1!!! because you just do, okay?!

Basement Dwelling Neckbeard 25/04/29(Tue)23:06 No. 5746

>>5745
Very simple, optimization if using esoteric C/C++ compiler that doesn't have the modern pattern recognition modern compilers have.

[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]