/phi/ - Philosophy

Anonymous 25/11/29(Sat)03:07 No. 17008

File 176438206760.png - (66.71KB , 289x180 , brb.png )

fascism/authoritarianism is foundationally an ethos, so to speak, of the slavish man (in a broad nongender sense, though, the insecurity involved is perhaps unique to literal men) and their mistrust, excessive posturing as strong, and single-minded pursuit of (and slavish devotion to) dominance for its own sake, is all a testament to the fact they are always slaves who (always as a matter of circumstance and complacency) have managed to worm their way into positions of authority-- and always with the same catastrophic outcome for themselves-- and, ultimately, they will always be slaves, blinded by hubris and drowning in pomp and pageantry

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master%E2%80%93slave_morality

Anonymous 25/11/29(Sat)11:51 No. 17009

>>17008
Wait so Germans are slavs? You do realize that Bolshevik shit got introduced by the Jews not the slavs, so if that's fascism and authoritarianism that you are referring to most people would not find a clear cut Slavic origin there.

Also it's clearly a disease of ideology, because there are different flavors, but it got exported to China and to North Korea with somewhat similar results to Russia. Or maybe you actually did mean Germany in which case is weird, because most people don't call Germans Slavic.

Anonymous 25/11/29(Sat)20:11 No. 17010

File 176444349980.png - (119.32KB , 267x180 , brb.png )

>>17009
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/slavish

Anonymous 25/11/29(Sat)20:46 No. 17012

File 17644455866.png - (94.12KB , 250x180 , brb.png )

Interesting to note, much of the german's plan was to colonize and enslave the slavs, with their inspiration being the accepted mode of operation of western powers a century or two prior. Though, as it turned out, slave labor kinda sucked, as the enslaved weren't particularly productive and tended to sabotage the things they were tasked with making. So, the labor camps became death camps as their war effort went sideways.

Hm, dominance for profits sake is only slightly less atrocious? Force should only be used as a last resort (or obviously extreme/deleterious circumstances) to maintain a reasonable degree of social order? Absolute social order is a) unobtainable and b) demonstrably, attempting to achieve it leads, very much, to the opposite.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoT_NHoRKFI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1T_98uT1IZs

Anonymous 25/12/06(Sat)03:05 No. 17018

File 176498672147.gif - (962.07KB , 500x700 , 01.gif )

Fascism equals violence

Anonymous 25/12/06(Sat)14:13 No. 17020

>>17018
true in the sense that you can only suppress speech through the threat of violence, because if there's no threat, why would I care about your opinion about what I can or cannot say...

[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]