-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
  1.   (reply to 16971)
  2. (for post and file deletion)
/phi/ - Philosophy A board for pretentious debates on epistemology, ethics, aesthetics, metaphysics, and logic.

Apply them to anything: Science, sex, your mom's cooking. No topic is too sacred or profane.
Consider this your haven where being a self-righteous, over-analytical asshole is encouraged.

What isn't allowed:

1. /b/, /x/, or /rnb/. Go spew your unhinged rants elsewhere.
2. Brainless drivel. If you can’t string two coherent thoughts together, take it to Twitter X.
3. Claims without arguments. "Because I say so" or "because you're gay" doesn’t count as reasoning. Repeatedly trolling and bait replies without substance will be banned.

Global rules apply. No, you can’t argue your way out of a ban for being an idiot. Add to the conversation, don't detract from it.

  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 977 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2018-08-24 Show/Hide Show All

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.


Anonymous 25/11/14(Fri)15:10 No. 16971
16971

File 176312944160.png - (54.89KB , 239x180 , brb.png )

hm, conservatives (if in name only) went from premarital sex and sexually active teens is bad, to condoning pedophilia and sex trafficking.

obviously they can't (but almost certainly will) argue cultural relativity, anthropology, or history (our lifespans were much more brief, thus procreating as early as possible so as to raise the child before the parents died) because it would be woke and such.

to be sure, procreation or genuine affection is not really the objective, so much as wanton gratification for a self-entitled few and selectively for those who adequately fill the coffers, well, should it be politically expedient to afford the unkempt masses an indulgence or two.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ToBlvZZxJ4


>>
Anonymous 25/11/14(Fri)19:43 No. 16973
16973

File 176314578097.png - (55.05KB , 162x180 , brb.png )

and of course, every human group in history has had norms/customs and transgressing, particularly egregiously (all the more so if compounded with glaring hypocrisy), is normally met with repercussions. and most people, certainly those with compassion and ethics/morality, don't tolerate abuse and exploitation of vulnerable/weak members of their society (or humanity in general), i.e. women and children. though, one supposes, chivalry is as foreign a concept as learning.


>>
Anonymous 25/11/14(Fri)20:03 No. 16974
16974

File 176314699897.png - (136.64KB , 270x203 , brb.png )

hey, isn't there a term for people who propose radical, and often rapid, societal change... /progressives/ correct?

ladies, ya'll don't need to apply liberal amounts of makeup or get liberal injections of botox to prove your worth, and if yo man don't like it, he has the liberty to find a new (prepubescent seems to be the ideal) female (or male) and you can liberate yourself from the shackles of repression and maybe hook-up with a sensitive liberal-arts professor (free lattes, amirite?), or something~ LIBerty is kinda nice, eh~





Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason