File 177473014834.jpg - (1.03MB , 3600x3056 , AttemptToExplain.jpg )

Here's the chapter were she implies it was common practice to rape page boys. They were between 7-12 years old at employment.

File 177473017043.jpg - (111.73KB , 800x881 , DeadBodyEroticism.jpg )

An example of her lusting after a dead body (acted)

File 17747302512.jpg - (81.29KB , 615x924 , HeDoesntLookSoGood.jpg )

Saint Sebastian was executed by arrows. There's painting of him bound to a tree and shot with arrows, but also paintings of women healing him. (he barely survived).

Apparently women were VERY MUCH into these Paintings. They totally lusted after the paintings of men bound and suffering.

Anyway, eventually the church frowned upon paintings of man and woman being so intimate with one another...

File 177473029718.jpg - (151.43KB , 1070x881 , EroticPlay.jpg )

>>19087
And then they replaced the women in these paintings witch Cherubs (naked child Angels).

And as the feminist author puts it: this only turned these paintings even more so into "erotic play".

File 17747304298.jpg - (206.01KB , 802x1168 , Chastity.jpg )

Also interesting: there's a chapter about "Chastity" fighting "love".

Chastity is personified by a fully clothed woman.

And the man is nearly naked. "Love" is shooting his last arrow into "Chastity's" shield.

It's an allegory or symbolism for how man can be deprived of sex and children until old age whereafter they turn desperate and are more likely to agree to things which otherwise they would not.

Acting chaste in public is just a strategy for women.

File 177473056868.jpg - (260.92KB , 737x1550 , FalseRapeAccusations.jpg )

There's also multiple pages dedicated to women making false accusations of rape.

Often times after a man refused to have sex with that woman. Sometime's it's a close family relative like an Aunt doing this.

... This makes it apparent how women can rape men. When women rape men it's "institutional". Because when you make a false accusations it's "institutions" which will ruin the life of that man.

As asinine as this sounds: when feminists write about "institutional sexual assault" they actually mean women raping men. (but you have to read feminist literature to understand that)

File 177473534138.jpg - (272.63KB , 1330x2048 , 20260307_001334.jpg )

>>19086
If that's what they look like, I'd would have raped one myself. Bro looks fucking good man. Aesthetic physique.

But I don't understand why you're writing all this, it's common knowledge that boys were raped back in the day. I think even in Sparta they did it, although don't quote me on that. There was a lot man on man live in ancient Greece and Rome. Hell even in Alexanders army half of them were fags, that's why they fought so well - had to protect their lovers.

>>19090
There's no such thing as institutional rape. Except when you have a backwards gynocentric society that makes both men and women miserable and either stagnates it all or straight up destroys the civilization and one could argue that only by moving forward can you avoid destruction - stagnation IS destruction.

So the problem isn't what we see on the surface such as women falsely accusing men of rape. It is that men are fucking pussies and have allowed the "vibes in the air" or "consensus opinions" to rule the civilization which is the feminine way of government (they are not supposed to govern, only to receive the luxury and benefits, they cannot handle actual power)...

Well, and it goes even deeper than that, but I don't want to expand too much lest nobody reads it, but actually it's men at the top who have hijacked the system for their shortsighted and selfish reasons of control. Or some of that devil worshiping shit which is really just boredom or psychopathy on their part.

I don't believe society as a whole, humanity as a whole is that dumb. There is agency involved in the predicament that we are in, it's not purely a result of retardation on a global mass scale. Agency by a few, you could say - bad actors, but highly agentic bad actors, which in a certain way is actually admirable. At least they're not standing by idly, which the good men tend to do, because the ones who are most capable of handling power, usually want to have it the least - for them it's a responsibility, not a thrill or a way to quench boredom or prop up ego which is ultimately a cheap reward compared to community creativity and more transcendent rewards available only to the wise and the willing to let go of the small me and take a good look at what could actually very well COULD be.

>>19092
You mean the schizophrenic influencing machine. (when it's really ancient technology)

I'm trying to figure out how to explain it to people without sounding like a schizophrenic.

>>19092
>"vibes in the air" or "consensus opinions"

What convinces people to not just be open about that?

File 177473832166.jpg - (167.21KB , 800x1048 , ImpliedCoitus.jpg )

She writes about how certain poses in paintings imply Coitus.

That's frankly very obvious... and yet everyone pretends this isn't what it's obviously is.

Also: since 1500 Cupid was increasingly depicted as trying to bang his own mother (venus/aphrodite)

>>19092
>but actually it's men at the top who have hijacked the system for their shortsighted and selfish reasons of control

If men were in control - we wouldn't see an increase in male genital mutilation of developed country.

I know exactly what you talk about (in so far that is possible) and it's so obviously the women who are running it.

>>19094
It's not about openness, it's about the final decision which should not be the consensus, because it is dumb as hell, the masses are dumb as hell, because the average IQ is 100.

Or maybe I misunderstood your question. I probably did, because the answer (in my interpretation) is actually obvious.

>>19096
Well, you know, not everything is as it seems.

First of all there are psychopaths

And second of all there are short-sided and bored sociopaths or just shortsighted individuals

And these groups tend to want to hoard power, because more transcendent forms of pleasure just go completely under the radar for them

In a way it's natural

But yes, mostly men, which then allow the gynocentric government to run the masses so as to easier control the masculine principle within the masses...

it's just a bit complicated, but in reality it's quite simple. They're using women to disarm the males. Women don't realize they're being used, but in the end it's all for the agentic purposes of the few on top. Well at least has been that way for a while. The gynocentric ruling moreso just when mass information and mass public opinion started aka fhe age of the internet.

File 177474156238.jpg - (60.60KB , 358x387 , SeminalDucts.jpg )

>>19098
That seems really off-topic, but: Did you know that the Hexenhammer mentioned that witches can magically close the seminal ducts? And that it makes men sterile but still able to spurt out (infertile) semen?

And the Hexenhammer was released 1486 and we didn't perform the first animal tests on seminal ducts until >1600?

I know that sounds really off-topic, but it was simply a "vibe in the air" that this is somehow relevant to what you write.

File 177474165519.png - (765.58KB , 538x796 , Manifesto_A.png )

>>19098
But perhaps is some more literature which could be related. This one is by Valerie Solanos. She writes in her Manifesto that once society is sufficiently automated men will be exterminated.

File 17747421968.jpg - (100.10KB , 800x639 , BoysWillBeAnnihilated.jpg )

>>19100
But even staying on topic: In the same book about boys she asserts that boys will later be annihilated because society has no use for them.

In fact, much feminist literature asserts that boys / men will be killed. Even old feminist literature does.

File 177474233367.jpg - (221.46KB , 800x1480 , Hermaphroditus.jpg )

Maybe that's also interesting: The term "hermaphrodite" originates from a story about a woman raping a man.

(the man keeps refusing, so she prays to the gods - and the gods answer her prayers and fuse their bodies together)

Something very few people know about about. Or at least i never heard anyone mention this ere i read this book.

>>19100
Yeah, I thought about this, one thing for sure, things are going to change drastically. It could be for the better also not just for the worse. The intersexual relationships will definitely change big time.

>>19102
Yeah, when I have sex (I'm psychic) I actually fuse bodies together, it's kind of trippy, like having two bodies at the same time, it's not like they physically fuse but in my consciousness I have two bodies.

>>19104
That sounds a lot of fun. But i wonder what you had to do in order to become Psychic. Based on what i read it doesn't seem like something that's just handed out.

>>19105
Hmmm hard to tell

But I was born with abnormal brain

>>19105
Gotta keep that thalamic gate open I suppose, and that tuning IS largely dependent on prenatal as well as early childhood phases.

>>19106
>hard to tell

I bet.

>early childhood phases.

What happened in your early childhood?

>>19107
>early childhood phases
Since you answered this thread i suspect you can relate to this book?