-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return] [Catalog]
Posting mode: Reply
  1.   (reply to 847243)
  2. (for post and file deletion)
/b/ - Random POLITICS ARE BANNED ON /b/ FOR NOW.
Direct all politics-related shit to /civ/ or get banned.

  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 10240 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 985 unique user posts.

  • Blotter updated: 2018-08-24 Show/Hide Show All

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.

WebMs have been re-enabled after a long absence.

We're testing an updated catalog view. Check the catalog link on your board and give feedback at /7ch/


Anonymous 26/10/30(Fri)18:11 No. 847243

File 17933802922.jpg - (24.83KB , 400x400 , images.jpg )

847243

Could longevity science be simplified to mere mathematics? That is, specifically, the catalogue of number based functions, as in university Calculus, where possibly a researcher, now possibly almost anyone with a computer, could search, at the most frontier that is maybe, and catalogue functions all day - functions corresponding to this same original longevity science, where every function would be a original or specific component of the longevity science, possibly treatment even. Does anyone think this is possible? Of course practical experiments to make specific treatments and make money would still be possible.


>>
Anonymous 26/10/30(Fri)18:22 No. 847244

Why the fuck do you need two threads for this? Also are you the same guy that wanted to apply calculus to the internet libraries or some shit?

To answer your question, there are certain systems like the body, like metaphysics, like a few other things that are so complex that applying reductive thinking to them only serves to confuse one. It's like you know better what an elephant is before you assume that the elephant is the elephant ear.

All that to say - longevity science is an oxymoron. Because body is too complex of a system to usefully apply reductive thinking to for the most part. Learn to listen to it first and learn some basic principles of how it works. It's an extremely complex system but even so, some very basic principles apply. You won't find those basic principles in your crebs cycles or whatever, I mean it can help, but only if you apply extremely small weights to it, because if you try to guide your decisions through those reductive lenses, trust me you will wreck your shit.


Cerebral thinking will wreck you in terms of taking care of the body. Unless it is paired with a healthy dose of listening, but yeah I don't know if I'm making my point, or if it will land for anyone, but yeah.

Use that intellect to build Bridges. Not for taking care of the body. It is too complex of for trying to break it down. Observe patterns rather and user intuition.

Or if you're trolling, good luck. It does sound like an intriguing way to troll. Good luck.





Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason