-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts] [First 100 posts]
>>
Anonymous 15/09/15(Tue)20:13 No. 17327 ID: a7464a

>>17326
Don't be down on yourself, you had good ideas and you executed them just fine.

Sounds on the 2's and an option for on every beat would just make your implementation perfect!


>>
Anonymous 15/09/16(Wed)00:06 No. 17328 ID: 2b7531

>>17326
>>17327
It's really a great idea to have flexibility even if you don't plan to make use of it. "Oh this is trying too hard" never makes for valuable commentary.
You should allow for simpler use cases but definitely build towards advanced applications.


>>
Anonymous 15/09/17(Thu)23:53 No. 17335 ID: 57e7cb

>>17328
I agree with this. What we should really be emulating is Super Deepthroat. Simple base with a whole array of advanced options to work with.


>>
Gscot 15/09/18(Fri)11:23 No. 17337 ID: bd478c

>>17336
It's unlikely this flash will be modified for widescreen. Those blocks are also just a palette I forgot to clean up.
I can see putting stuff in the empty space though. I'm already hard pressed for time on the current version, but I have an idea for the last update. Thanks for the inspiration!


>>
Anonymous 15/09/19(Sat)10:55 No. 17339 ID: de2355

>>17337
i disagree i can see it being widescreen a little bit, there's just something so sexy about seeing all the way to the knees and getting the full picture rather than have restrictions, maybe change the border size so we can be able to see everything the way it was ment to be. just like with the ppppSuperWiiUv4_interactive swf


>>
Anonymous 15/09/19(Sat)20:45 No. 17340 ID: dba96f

>>17337

I totally agree, seeing it in widescreen would be so much better. And it is possible because in ppppSuperWiiUv4 you could see the whole thing. Just something you could possibly work on later. But keep up the good work, i have faith that you will improve and finish this flash.


>>
Anonymous 15/09/21(Mon)07:21 No. 17358 ID: 71ef20

what's minus8's new blog? purindad got purged it seems.


>>
Gscot 15/09/25(Fri)08:58 No. 17389 ID: bd478c
17389

File vagina1test.swf - (61.45KB )

So, it was suggested to make the vagina in the anal scenes a bit more detailed. How is this compared to that: >>17256


>>
Anonymous 15/09/28(Mon)23:07 No. 17427 ID: 64894e

yo Gscot, when do you think you might me done with the new update?





Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason